The Proposed Federal Budget: Tax Cuts For The Wealthy On The Backs Of Babies
If we believe that the federal budget is a reflection of our values and priorities as a nation, then we may soon look like a nation that cares little about the future of our most defenseless children. As discussed at the November 8 Center for American Progress panel discussion, Protecting the Youngest Americans: What’s at Stake for Infants and Toddlers in the Budget Fight, the proposed 2018 federal budget seeks to deeply cut or eliminate many of the programs that cover millions of children’s most basic needs—all to provide tax cuts for the wealthy. Children birth to five are uniquely vulnerable to these proposed cuts, but they largely have been left out of the budget conversation.
The proposed budget decimates the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the Women, Infants, and Children Program, affordable housing, and healthcare, and completely eliminates the Low Income Energy Assistance Program. The absence of these programs can lead to toxic stress in young children which, unlike manageable stress, refers to the long-term changes in brain architecture and organ systems that develop after extreme, prolonged, and repeated stress goes untreated. Exposure to Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) such as toxic stress may put our children at higher risk for learning difficulties, emotional problems, developmental issues and long-term health problems.
That this budget plan is even being proposed is particularly infuriating given the complete failure of a similar plan in Kansas. The state’s 2012 tax overhaul was heralded as a model for the nation, with a number of provisions later adapted for the national tax plans proposed by many Republicans. But even deeply conservative Kansas found the approach austere, leaving analysts from the left and the right to name the plan “the worst in the nation.” This year, the Republican-controlled Legislature rejected the tax-cutting experiment.
Kansas proved that the well-being of our children is a bipartisan issue. The current administration needs to be reminded of this. Parents and early childhood advocates need to speak up on behalf of our children, who can’t speak up for themselves. We must continue to point to the science of early brain development that proves the impact of early experiences on lifelong health and well-being. We can also argue that early care and education outlay offers one of the greatest returns on investment. In fact, putting money into early care and education is the only way to ensure a prosperous and sustainable society.
Go here or here to help prevent tax cuts for the wealthy at the expense of our youngest children.
Explore More
Informal and Formal Supports May Affect Hispanic Early Educators’ Physical and Mental Well-Being
Report September 13, 2024
This brief, published by National Research Center on Hispanic Children and Families, aims to improve our understanding of the well-being of the Hispanic ECE workforce and how ECE programs may play a role in their well-being (or “wellness”).
Beyond Bans and the Challenge We Face: Crafting Effective State Strategies to Reduce Suspension and Expulsion in Early Childhood Settings
Report September 10, 2024
State policies on early learning suspension and expulsion either do not exist or are insufficient. The BUILD Initiative contends that a more thoughtful, multi-pronged or layered state policy approach is needed—one that reflects an understanding of expulsion as a symptom of problems related to quality, equity, and adequate supports. This document lays out BUILD's point of view on early learning suspension and expulsion.
Nurture Connection: A National Impact Network for Early Relational Health
Archived Webinar April 30, 2024
In this webinar we learn more about Nurture Connection, a national impact network that partners with families and communities to promote Early Relational Health (ERH).